subscribe
 

Latest developments in carbon filter technology for recirculating fume cabinets

1st April 2013


Robert Monks reports the development of a range of filters with environmentally friendly carbon.

With the ever-increasing demands for improved air quality in the workplace, removal of fumes is essential. More and more laboratories are using recirculatory filtration cabinets.

Many commercial filters using impregnated carbons contain chemicals that are undesirable from personnel safety and environmental viewpoints. Hexavalent chromium, in the form of potassium chromate, is a good impregnant for acid-retaining carbons, but is also toxic, corrosive to skin and eyes, and carcinogenic.

Copper (II) chloride, used to treat carbons for ammonia, amine and other alkaline species retention, presents additional hazards to health and to the environment.

Therefore, alternative, low-hazard impregnants for a new Bigneat range of filters to be named Chemcap were investigated and subsequently used. Development work for these filters was carried out in the laboratories of the Department of Applied Chemistry at the University of Portsmouth in the UK, which has 40 years experience in the field of porous carbon solids.

Diversity

Carbon, element 6 in the Periodic Table, is remarkable for the diversity and utility of its forms. As graphite it slows down neutrons in nuclear reactors and lubricates at high temperature; as diamond it sparkles and captivates, as well as providing industrial cutting power; as Buckminsterfullerene, or Bucky balls, it is providing the electronics and pharmaceutical industries with a wealth of fascinating possibilities.

But these allotropic forms of carbon are only the beginning; the element also finds widespread use as Aactivated carbon, a highly porous, high surface area material with an almost limitless range of uses as a purifier of liquids and gases.

With starting materials as diverse as coal and coconut shells, the use of crude forms of activated carbons stretches back into antiquity.

Large scale use of the more sophisticated product only began in the 20th century, with the need to protect troops from the poisonous gases used in First World War.

Military applications have progressed considerably since then, and modern nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) protection is usually based around forms of activated carbon.

Activated carbon is used in the purification of water, for removing organic species and excess chlorine, in solvent recovery to prevent loss of hydrocarbons to the atmosphere, and in air conditioning plant to remove trace odours.

Modern cars have carbon filters installed in fuel systems to prevent vapour loss to the environment, and some varieties of intoxicating drink sold in Scandinavia are made by the addition of flavours to alcohol previously rendered tasteless by treatment with activated carbon.

From an occupational safety point of view, activated carbon is indispensable, and is capable of retaining a wide range of organic solvents, acids, alkalis and species such as formaldehyde.

However it is necessary to impregnate the carbon with suitable chemicals to maximise filtration performance.

The development of the Bigneat Chemcap filter range was carried out with reference to a number of very important criteria, namely:

* Filters had to give high retention capacity.

* Chemical treatments for enhanced acid or alkali retention had to be non-hazardous to operatives undertaking the carbon impregnation work and to the environment when exhausted carbon is sent for landfill, etc.

* When used in conjunction with the Bigneat range of ductless fume hoods, filter performance had to conform to the requirements of internationally recognised test procedures, such as AFNOR and BS 7989:2001.

* Rigorous quality control procedures had to be developed for all stages of filter production, from activated carbon manufacture through to the performance of the final product.

In the course of the Chemcap filter development work at Portsmouth University, the performance of carbons, filters and fume hoods has been assessed with around 150 different challenge chemicals.

The Chemcap filters currently in use provide outstanding retention capacities for solvents(type OS), acids (type H+), alkalis (type AM).

In addition, type MP filters give excellentall-round performance in circumstances where solvents, acids and alkalis are used in the enclosure, and type F is a special filter for formaldehyde retention.

International standards

The new Bigneat cabinets in combination with Chemcap cabinets offer effective containment and high levels of operator safety. But how is this proven?

As far as conformity to international specifications is concerned, Bigneat fume cabinets are assessed against the French AFNOR test and the British Standard for ductless fume hoods.

The AFNOR NF X 15-211 standard for enclosures of Class 2 requires that their filtration performance be assessed in two phases of operation.

In Phase 1, normal operation, the amount of toxic material retained by the filtration system is determined at the point at which the concentration of the material in the exhaust gases reaches1 per cent of the VME for that material.

In Phase 2, the detection phase, the additional amount of toxic material retained by the filtration system is determined at the point at which the concentration of the material in the exhaust gases reaches 50 per cent of the VME.

A challenge concentration of 200 ppm in the air stream is required throughout the test. Withpropan-2-ol as the challenge, the Bigneat system gave a retention capacity of 350 grams in Phase 1 and an additional 1130 grams retention in Phase 2.

The British Standard, BS 7989: 2001, requires a capacity type test to be carried out, usingpropan-2-ol challenge at a much higher concentration than in the AFNOR test, ie 800 ppm compared to 200 ppm.

The Bigneat enclosure fitted with a type OS filter had no trouble in complying with the requirement that no more than 40 ppm of solvent should be emitted with the exhaust gas during the evaporation of 1 litre of solvent, and that no more than 400 ppm should be emitted during the evaporation of 2 litres of solvent.

Enter 65 or at www.scientistlive.com/elab

Robert Monks is with Bigneat Containment Technology, Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK. www.bigneat.com





Subscribe

Subscribe



Newsbrief

FREE NEWSBRIEF SUBSCRIPTION

To receive the Scientist Live weekly email NewsBrief please enter your details below

Twitter Icon © Setform Limited
subscribe