Science news, opinion, interviews and product reports for scientists across all disciplines. Make Scientist Live my homepage  SciLive on Twitter21st November 2009

BookMark


Search

 

Readers Poll


Yes
No
Undecided


View Results »

Subscribe

Subscribe to Scientist Live

Click here for FREE subscription to eLab and eFood magazines

 

Newsletter

RSS Feed

Get the Scientist Live RSS Feed
RSS Feed

Visit our Products and Services Section


ITCM is a global manufacturer and leading innovator in customised machinery and systems for pharmaceutical packaging and processing.
eLab 2009-5-15 Issue

 View online magazine
 
 


eFood 2009-10-01 Issue

 View online magazine
 

eLab - Imaging Microscopy

CT scans increase cancer risk estimates

Physicians should review a patient's CT imaging history and cumulative radiation dose when considering whether to perform another CT exam, according to researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

The study included 130 patients who had at least three emergency department visits within one year in which they had a CT scan of the neck, chest, abdomen or pelvis. "We gathered the recent CT exam histories for each of these patients and found that half had undergone ten or more CT scans in the previous eight years, up to a maximum of 70 CT scans," said Aaron Sodickson, MD, PhD. "Using typical dose values and standard risk estimation methods, we calculated that half of our group had accrued additional radiation-induced cancer risks above baseline greater than 1 in 110, up to a maximum of 1 in 17."

"A patient's cumulative risk of radiation-induced cancers is believed to increase with increasing cumulative radiation dose. The level of risk is further increased for patients scanned at young ages and is in general greater for women than for men. There is no absolute threshold, however, and the potential risks of radiation induced cancer must be balanced against the expected clinical benefits of the CT scan for the patient's particular scenario," he said.

"CT is a tremendously valuable clinical tool in a wide variety of settings and disease processes, and as a result CT utilisation has grown rapidly in recent years. Continued attention will be needed to keep radiation risks in check through a combination of technological advances, optimised imaging techniques, appropriateness criteria and patient-specific risk/benefit assessments," said Dr. Sodickson.

This study appears in the April issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology. For a copy of the full study, please contact Heather Curry via email at hcurry@arrs.org.

 

©2008 Setform Limited

Site By OWB