FREE subscription to Science magazines
Science news, opinion, interviews and product reports for scientists across all disciplines. Make Scientist Live my homepage  SciLive on Twitter16th March 2010

BookMark


Search

 

FREE Subscription

FREE subscription to Science magazines

Click here for FREE subscription to leading Science magazines

 

FREE Newsletter

Readers Poll


Yes
No
Don't know


View Results »

RSS Feed

Get the Scientist Live RSS Feed
RSS Feed

Visit our Products and Services Section


ITCM is a global manufacturer and leading innovator in customised machinery and systems for pharmaceutical packaging and processing.
eLab 01-12-09 Issue

 View online magazine
 
 


eFood 2009-10-01 Issue

 View online magazine
 

eLab - Opinion

Crawling the Web: Science news

Scientist Live turns its eyes to the Web around it and highlights science news and research across the Internet. Today's instalment looks at developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.

GENETICS

Constraints in embryonic development are thought to bias the direction of evolution by making some changes less likely, and others more likely, depending on their consequences on ontogeny. Here, we characterize the constraints acting on genome evolution in vertebrates. We used gene expression data from two vertebrates: zebrafish, using a microarray experiment spanning 14 stages of development, and mouse, using EST counts for 26 stages of development. We show that, in both species, genes expressed early in development (1) have a more dramatic effect of knock-out or mutation and (2) are more likely to revert to single copy after whole genome duplication, relative to genes expressed late. This supports high constraints on early stages of vertebrate development, making them less open to innovations (gene gain or gene loss). Results are robust to different sources of data—gene expression from microarrays, ESTs, or in situ hybridizations; and mutants from directed KO, transgenic insertions, point mutations, or morpholinos. We determine the pattern of these constraints, which differs from the model used to describe vertebrate morphological conservation (“hourglass” model). While morphological constraints reach a maximum at mid-development (the “phylotypic” stage), genomic constraints appear to decrease in a monotonous manner over developmental time.

- Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M (2008) Developmental Constraints on Vertebrate Genome Evolution. PLoS Genet 4(12): e1000311. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000311

 

©2008 Setform Limited

Site By OWB