FREE subscription to Science magazines
Science news, opinion, interviews and product reports for scientists across all disciplines. Make Scientist Live my homepage  SciLive on Twitter19th March 2010

BookMark


Search

 

FREE Subscription

FREE subscription to Science magazines

Click here for FREE subscription to leading Science magazines

 

FREE Newsletter

Readers Poll


Yes
No
Don't know


View Results »

RSS Feed

Get the Scientist Live RSS Feed
RSS Feed

Visit our Products and Services Section


ITCM is a global manufacturer and leading innovator in customised machinery and systems for pharmaceutical packaging and processing.
eFood 2009-10-01 Issue

 View online magazine
 
 


eLab 01-12-09 Issue

 View online magazine
 

eFood - Technology

Monitoring crop pests

The United States is one of the most important crop production areas in the world, so its vulnerability to crop pests is a vital concern. Ten such pests are estimated to enter the country every year, and the federal government spends more than $1 billion annually on research, emergency response, and education related to crop pests.

A graphical analysis that assesses the vulnerability of different crops to pests in the United States is described in the February issue of BioScience. Margaret L. Margosian of Kansas State University and her colleagues based their work on county-level information about the amount of four key crops grown per hectare across the lower 48. By assuming that pests spread more easily between closely spaced counties and between those with high densities of a particular crop, they could identify regions of the country within which pests affecting the crop in question should move relatively easily. The analysis was repeated for hypothetical pests that are transmitted with different levels of difficulty.

Data on soybean, maize, wheat, and cotton yielded distinctly different patterns of connectivity at the national scale. The soybean crop was judged highly connected for easily transmitted pests, and thus potentially vulnerable to their spread. It was however, less connected for less easily transmitted pests. Maize was vulnerable to pests with a wide range of transmissibilities. Cotton and wheat, in contrast, were much less connected nationally.

Margosian and colleagues suggest their type of analysis could help in the formulation of strategies for dealing with invasive pathogens and pests. It might, for example, be prudent to encourage cropping patterns that disrupt connectivity, to minimise the likelihood that a pest will spread. And once a pathogen or pest has been introduced, graphical analysis could suggest where and when radical interventions, such as crop eradication, might be justified to prevent the pest's spread.

 

©2008 Setform Limited

Site By OWB